Saturday, July 26, 2014

Israel or True Israel?

As with many of my posts, I know this is not going to make me popular, but the current situation with Israel has sparked a desire to share some thoughts on the subject and hopefully shed light on misunderstandings many people have with regard to Israel.

First, I want to say that this will not be a political post. If fact, I dislike politics in general, and I think many Christians today need to realize that while politics are important, they will never solve the problems of this world. Politics are not the answer; the gospel is. Only the return of Christ and the consummation of His kingdom will ultimately put all wrongs to right. Second, my purpose is to attempt to look at this situation from a biblical perspective and try to show why unconditional support for the nation of Israel may not always be wise. Now before you light torches to burn me as a heretic, hear me out.

Race or Remnant?

Many Christians are under the misapprehension that Israel is God's chosen people based upon race. The Bible says otherwise. One of the texts often quoted is Deuteronomy 7:6-7:

“For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the Lord set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples."

Yes, this is absolutely true, but notice the reason for God's choice. It wasn't because Israel was so special, but because "the Lord set his love" on them. God chose to love them for His own purposes. Yet how many times did Israel disobey the Lord? How many times did they provoke Him to anger because of their idol worship? The texts would be too numerous to cite. Anyone who has read the Old Testament knows this. They continuously rebelled against God and broke His covenant over and over. God, however, continued to set His love upon them. In fact, Deuteronomy 7 sounds an awful lot like the doctrine of unconditional election.

I find it ironic that many who champion the modern state of Israel are diametrically opposed to the doctrine of election. They have no problem with God distinguishing Jews from other people, but cannot bear the thought that God would unconditionally choose the elect before the foundation of the world. What do you think election is if not choosing a particular people? I'm sorry to say this, but to affirm the Jews are God's chosen people, but deny that God chooses His elect for salvation is hypocritical. The key factor to recognize is that God's choice is not based on ethnicity, but according to the purpose of His will (Eph. 1:5, 11).

Now I realize that during Old Testament times, the vast majority of Gentile nations were left in darkness, however, there was a mixed multitude that left Egypt in the Exodus (Exod. 12:38). And there were laws that applied to Israelites as well as to aliens and sojourners (Exod. 20:10, Lev. 16:29, 22:18). Further, many Israelites were apostate. But God kept for Himself a faithful remnant, (Rom. 11:4, 1 Kgs. 19:18) which is true Israel; not a specific nation, but rather, people from every tribe, tongue, and nation.

And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation," (Rev. 5:9).

These are God's chosen people, from every race under heaven that have been purchased by the blood of the Lamb.

Not All Israel is Israel

In Romans chapter 9 Paul says, "But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel," (Rom. 9:6). What in the world does that mean Paul? What are you talking about? Well, in the rest of the chapter, Paul goes on to show that God's choice was not based upon race. Rather, "the children of the promise are counted as offspring," (Rom. 9:8). God chose Isaac over Ishmael, Jacob over Esau, why? Paul tells us in verse 11, "…in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls."

In the book of Galatians Paul explains that whether you are a Jew or a Gentile is irrelevant. In Galatians 3:16 he says the promises were made to Abraham's offspring, who is Christ, and then in verses 28 and 29 he says, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise." God told Abraham he would be the father of many nations (not Israel only) and that through his offspring (Jesus) all the nations of the earth would be blessed (Gen. 12:3, 22:18, etc.).

In fact, the very language used for Israel in the Old Testament is used by Peter and applied to the church.

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light," (1 Pet. 2:9).

Did you know there are Palestinian Christians? That's right; Palestinian Christians. That may come as a shock to some people, but it's true. There are also Jewish Christians. We cannot broad-brush people solely based on their nationality. Nor can we let misinterpreted passages of Scripture cloud our minds. We must understand the Bible clearly. All believers are one in Christ. Listen to what Peter said after his encounter with Cornelius:

So Peter opened his mouth and said: “Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him," (Acts 10:34-35).

After hearing Peter's story, the church in Jerusalem responded by saying, “Then to the Gentiles also God has granted repentance that leads to life,” (Acts 11:18).

God has made the two one. He has broken down the wall of separation (Eph. 2:14) and has grafted Gentiles into His family (Rom. 11:17).

The Promised Land

The land of Palestine is a very touchy subject. I know I am treading on sacred ground here (pun intended). But I am going to say something that may shock some people. The modern state of Israel does not have a divine right to the land of Palestine. Gasp! I realize that there are all kinds of eschatological views on this subject, which I am not going to address, however, Christians seem to forget that the promises God made to Israel concerning the land were conditional. That's right; they were conditional. If Israel followed the Lord and kept His commandments they would be blessed, but if they disobeyed, they would be exiled from the land. And this is exactly what happened with the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities. So why would the modern state of Israel which doesn't keep God's covenants, and has for the most part rejected their Messiah, have a divine right to the land? Again, the promises were based upon obedience to the covenant God made with them.

Moreover, the temporal land promises were actually fulfilled. Wait a minute. The land promises were fulfilled? Yes, they were fulfilled. Let's look at a few passages of Scripture.

"Thus the Lord gave to Israel all the land that he swore to give to their fathers. And they took possession of it, and they settled there. And the Lord gave them rest on every side just as he had sworn to their fathers… Not one word of all the good promises that the Lord had made to the house of Israel had failed; all came to pass," (Joshua 21:43, 45).

"Solomon ruled over all the kingdoms from the Euphrates to the land of the Philistines and to the border of Egypt. They brought tribute and served Solomon all the days of his life," (1 Kings 4:21).

Now don't those borders sound familiar? Yes, they do. This is exactly what God promised to give Abraham (Gen. 15:18, etc.). So before you tar and feather me, please read your Bible. God fulfilled His promise. Further, the writer of Hebrews tells us that Abraham "was looking forward to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God," (Heb. 11:10). The Promised Land foreshadowed the rest believers will enjoy someday in the new heaven and the new earth (Rev. 21:1).

We must understand that the land, the temple, the choosing of Israel; all the types and shadows of the Old Testament find their fulfillment in Christ (Matt. 5:17).

Conclusion

So does Israel have the right to exist as a nation? Of course. Should they protect their borders? Yes. Do they have the right to defend themselves against unjust attacks? Absolutely! We should support Israel, but our support must be filtered through the pages of Scripture. The Bible teaches that anyone, whether Jew or Gentile, who is not a follower of Christ is under the wrath of God unless they repent and believe (John 3:36, Eph. 2:3). What Jewish people need is the gospel. It isn't about nationality; it's about spirituality, those who are united to Christ through His death and resurrection. God will always have a remnant, chosen by grace (Rom. 11:5). Therefore, the Jews are only God's chosen people in so far as they have placed their faith in Jesus the Messiah.

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Pray Like a Calvinist

If you are someone who believes free will is the ultimate decisive factor in whether or not someone will be saved, I would like to ask you a question. Why bother praying for your hard-hearted loved ones? You're not praying to change God's mind, right? Doesn't He already desire their salvation? If so, and you are praying for God to change the heart of your loved one, and you believe that He can in fact overcome their resistance to the gospel, then you don't really believe in free will. Rather, Christians pray believing that God is sovereign and more than able to melt hearts of stone, and turn the vilest of sinners into lovers of Christ. You see, when it comes to prayer, all Christians pray like Calvinists.

Inconsistency

I cannot tell you how many times I have heard Arminians (or anyone who opposes Reformed theology) pray things like, "Oh Lord please change his heart!" Or say things such as, "We cannot convert anyone, all we can do is share the gospel and pray. Only the Holy Spirit can change the heart." Wait a second...what did you just say? That sounds an awful lot like Calvinism to me.

I just want to go on record as saying that I agree with these sentiments wholeheartedly. They are entirely biblical. Only God can change a person's heart. The problem is, it doesn't follow consistently with Arminian theology.

Simply put, those who promote free will and reject the doctrines of grace believe that God is "trying" to save everyone, but it is up to each individual to exercise their will and respond to the gospel. Yes, everyone is commanded to respond to the gospel, but as I addressed in a previous post, this doesn't mean unconverted people have the ability to do so. Jesus said that no one has the ability to come to Him unless the Father grants them that ability, (John 6:44, 65). The real question Arminians need to answer is why some respond to the gospel and others do not. This is their Achilles heel.

When someone with no desire for Christ hears the gospel, what is it that changes their mind exactly? Do they come to Christ on their own? Of course not; all Arminians believe that it is impossible to be saved apart from the grace of God. They just don't go far enough. They say grace is necessary for salvation, but not sufficient. The problem here, is that if everyone receives what they call "prevenient grace" why is this grace effectual in the hearts of some and ineffectual in others? What exactly makes someone willing? It seems like the only logical response is to say the human will has the ultimate decisive power. God's grace doesn't get the job done. You may have heard preachers say, "God is voting for you, and Satan is voting against you, but you have the final vote. If this is true, then salvation is contingent upon the human will, not upon God.

In the final analysis, although Arminians would never say this, this makes God powerless. He may desire to save someone, but is unable to do so because their free will thwarts Him. This makes man sovereign because he can thwart the very purposes of Almighty God. Again, Arminians wouldn't say this, but this is the logical conclusion of their theology.

Prayer

The irony comes into play when those who espouse this kind of philosophy pray for God to save someone. Doesn't that require God to violate a person's free will? If they believe prayer can actually change someone's heart, then they are conceding that God intervenes by His sovereign power to change the disposition of men's hearts, yet this is antithetical to free-willism.

Those who oppose Reformed theology often accuse us of futility when it comes to prayer. The argument goes something like this: "Why do you Calvinists bother praying at all? If God has chosen from all eternity to save someone; He's going to save them no matter what. So why bother praying for their salvation? Why bother even preaching the gospel?" This kind of reasoning shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Reformed theology teaches. We believe that God uses means to accomplish His eternal purposes. So God may have chosen to save Johnny unconditionally before the foundation of the world, but my prayers and witness may be the means by which Johnny is brought into the kingdom. He has not only ordained Johnny's salvation, but the means by which it is brought about. No one knows the identity of the elect; in fact, the identity of the elect is totally irrelevant to evangelism. We simply do what the Bible tells us to do. We preach the gospel and command people to repent and believe. Faith comes by hearing (Rom. 10:17) so God uses the means of preaching and prayer to bring about the salvation of His elect people.

"For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God," 1 Cor. 1:22-24.

What is it in this passage that makes the preaching of Christ crucified cease to be a stumbling block or foolishness? "...those who are called," that's the difference. To the ones who are called, Christ crucified is no longer foolishness, but wisdom. When God calls someone unto salvation, He does so effectually (John 6:37, Rom. 8:30).

Conclusion

So if you're an Arminian and you are praying for a change of heart in the life of an unbeliever, I commend you. Just be aware that it is inconsistent with your theology. You're actually praying like a Calvinist; like a Christian ought to pray, because we trust that God is omnipotent. He is able to remove hearts of stone and replace them with hearts of flesh (Ezek. 36:26). We pray with confidence knowing that nothing is impossible for God. No amount of resistance to the gospel can hinder the power of the Holy Spirit. Whether the hardest atheist or the most wicked murderer, no one is beyond the grace of God.